Case Summary
This case involves P.T.Sudha and others as plaintiffs against P.T.Geetha as the defendant regarding the partition of property. A final decree was sought based on a prior preliminary decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition of property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court passed a final decree for the partition of property based on the Advocate Commissioner's report. The property was allotted to the respective parties as per the final decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Advocate Commissioner's report was accepted without objection from the parties.
The Advocate Commissioner's report was accepted without objection from the parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The Advocate Commissioner's report was accepted without objection from the parties.
The Advocate Commissioner's report was accepted without objection from the parties.
Supporting Evidence
None of the parties to the final decree petition have raised any serious objection to the Commissioner's report filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Accordingly, a final decree is passed as follows.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.T.Sudha
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.T.Satheesan
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nirmala
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.T,Athira
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.T.Geetha
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Exhibit C1 report, Exhibit C1(a) plan.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Abdul Azeez
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Snehal Tom
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A final decree was passed that allocated various plots of land to the respective parties.
Evidence:
Accordingly, a final decree is passed as follows.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court relied upon this report for the purpose of passing the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This plan was also used for the purpose of passing the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.T.Sudha et al vs P.T.Geetha regarding final decree in partition.
Case Code Year
Case between P.T.Sudha et al vs P.T.Geetha regarding final decree in partition.