Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 1104/2022

Case between Priti Vadakkath vs Space 118 et al regarding dismissal of the suit.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Priti Vadakkath as the plaintiff against Space 118 and DTDC Express Pvt. Ltd. as defendants. The plaintiff was not present for the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence in the listed case, which resulted in the dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence in the listed case, which resulted in the dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
Both represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case.

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Priti Vadakkath
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Space 118
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
DTDC Express Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saiby Jose Kidangoor
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Naail Fathima Abdulla A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Swathy Sudhir
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aditya Kiran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pranitha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Tanoosha Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. N Sivasankaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandhra S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunil Sankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sabu S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Leejoy Mathew V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rakesh Leo
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bijin B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Priti Vadakkath vs Space 118 et al regarding dismissal of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Priti Vadakkath vs Space 118 et al regarding dismissal of the suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won