Case Summary
Priju. P is the plaintiff seeking an ad-interim injunction against Manu, the defendant. The court found that the plaintiff made a prima facie case for the injunction to prevent the defendant from damaging property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, preventing any alterations to the property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case for the injunction.
The plaintiff established a prima facie case for the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case for the injunction.
The plaintiff established a prima facie case for the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from creating new pathway through petition B schedule property or from causing damage to the compound wall or fix any gate in the compound wall in order to trespass into petition B schedule property until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Priju. P
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manu
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Paul Sudhakar
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G.S. Sanal Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioner from creating new pathway or causing damage to the compound wall until further orders.
Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from creating new pathway through petition B schedule property or from causing damage to the compound wall or fix any gate in the compound wall in order to trespass into petition B schedule property until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit along with plaint and other documents to make its decision.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court perused the plaint along with affidavit and other documents to make its decision.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Priju. P vs Manu regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Priju. P vs Manu regarding injunction