Case Summary
The plaintiff, Premlal, filed a suit against the defendants for the realisation of money. However, the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff during the court hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Premlal
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Leena
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kamaludden
- Party Age
- 58
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/S. Kent
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Gangadharan.G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.Y.Johnson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Vimal Nath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Premlal vs Leena et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Premlal vs Leena et al regarding realisation of money