Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 738/2023

Case between Prathap Chandran vs Ashkar C et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2026-01-17
Duration
Case Closed
Sat, 01/17/2026 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Prathap Chandran filed a suit against Ashkar C and Basheera. The plaintiff was absent and did not represent himself in court despite specific directions.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by Prathap Chandran was dismissed due to his continuous absence from court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Prathap Chandran was dismissed due to his continuous absence from court.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prathap Chandran
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashkar C
Party Age
59
Relation
Father’s name not known to the plaintiff
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Basheera
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K Mohammed Rafeeq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanaldev E P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Neeraj T N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nidhin K N
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ambadi Murali
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed due to plaintiff's absence and intent not to proceed.
Evidence:
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prathap Chandran vs Ashkar C et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Prathap Chandran vs Ashkar C et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Sat, 01/17/2026 - 12:00
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won