Case Summary
This case involves decree holders Prascal and Lilly against judgment debtors Santhakumar, Predeson, and Marsalil regarding an execution petition. The petition was dismissed for default due to the decree holder's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was filed by the decree holders but was dismissed as the decree holder was absent without representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prascal
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lilly
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhakumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Predeson
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Marsalil
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Panambil.S. Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prascal et al vs Santhakumar et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Prascal et al vs Santhakumar et al regarding execution petition