Case Summary
The petitioners, Prasanna.R. and Vijayan, sought to set aside an order and restore a petition. The court dismissed the execution application due to costs not being paid.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Application
Final Judgment
No
The execution application was dismissed due to costs not being paid.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Execution Application dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasanna.R.
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vijayan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Harshakumar
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.Harshakumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.S.Pramod
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.R.Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G.Haridas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Execution Application dismissed.
Evidence:
Costs not paid. Hence Execution Application dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prasanna.R. vs Harshakumar et al regarding Execution Application
Case Code Year
Case between Prasanna.R. vs Harshakumar et al regarding Execution Application