Case Summary
This case involves an execution petition filed by Decree Holder Prasannan against Judgment Debtor Sreekumar. The court order states that the salary of the judgment debtor has been attached and is being remitted to the court every month.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition is closed for the time being, allowing the decree holder the liberty to revive the petition if necessary.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The salary of the judgment debtor has been attached in compliance with the decree.
The salary of the judgment debtor has been attached in compliance with the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The salary of the judgement debtor has been attached, and it is being remitted to the court every month.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence for the time being EP closed and the decree holder has liberty to revive the execution petition by filing memo for the balance decree amount if any is pending.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasannan
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekumar
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- Paul Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prasannan vs Sreekumar regarding execution of decree
Case Code Year
Case between Prasannan vs Sreekumar regarding execution of decree