Case Summary
The plaintiff, Prasanna, filed a suit for injunction against multiple defendants including Lejeesh. The court dismissed the case for want of prosecution as the plaintiff remained absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
As the plaintiff remained absent, suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasanna
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lejeesh
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sasikumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Girija
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G.Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Siju.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.Sankara Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Evidence:
As the plaintiff remained absent, suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prasanna vs Lejeesh et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Prasanna vs Lejeesh et al regarding Injunction