Case Summary
The case involves Prameela as the plaintiff and Manitha Krishnakumar and Valsala as defendants. The plaintiff filed a suit for the fixation of boundary, but remained absent during the trial.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff did not appear for the trial, and consequently, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prameela
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manitha Krishnakumar
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Valsala
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Siju.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deepu.I
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajith A Khader
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jasmine.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Fixation of boundary
Case Code
Case between Prameela vs Manitha Krishnakumar, Valsala regarding fixation of boundary.
Case Code Year
Case between Prameela vs Manitha Krishnakumar, Valsala regarding fixation of boundary.