Case Summary
The case involves petitioners Prakasini, Ajitha, and Saseendran seeking a supplemental final decree regarding the allotment of plots as per a prior order. The respondents were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Supplemental final decree allowing the allotment of plots.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court passed a supplemental final decree allotting specific plots to the petitioners as per the court's earlier order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition for a supplemental final decree was justified based on the prior allotments and the absence of objections from the respondents.
The petition for a supplemental final decree was justified based on the prior allotments and the absence of objections from the respondents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition for a supplemental final decree was justified based on the prior allotments and the absence of objections from the respondents.
The petition for a supplemental final decree was justified based on the prior allotments and the absence of objections from the respondents.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioners contend that as per order in FDIA 46/22, plot was allotted to the final decree petitioner. Hence, this petition is filed to pass a supplemental final decree and allot plots to the petitioners as per Ext.C1 report and plan submitted in the FDIA.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, a supplemental final decree is passed as follows. 1.That plot B shown in Ext.C1(a) plan shall be allotted to the share of petitioner No.3 (Defendant No.3 in the Suit). 2.That plot D shown in Ext.C1(a) plan shall be allotted to the share of petitioner No.1(Defendant No.1 in the suit) 3.That Plot E shown in Ext.C1(a) plan shall be allotted to the share of petitioner No.2(Defendant No.2 in the suit). 4.Ext.C1 and C1(a) shall form part of the supplemental final decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prakasini
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ajitha
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saseendran
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prakasan T
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gireesh T
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext.C1 report and plan.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Mohanan Eravath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A supplemental final decree is passed to allot plots to the petitioners.
Evidence:
Hence, a supplemental final decree is passed as follows.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court used this document to allot plots to the petitioners as per the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court referenced this plan for the allocation of plots to the petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prakasini et al vs Prakasan T et al regarding supplemental final decree.
Case Code Year
Case between Prakasini et al vs Prakasan T et al regarding supplemental final decree.