Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.254/2021

Case between Pradeepan vs Pushkaran regarding injunction concerning property

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-04-09
Duration
approximately-2 years 9 months 9 days
Case Closed
Wed, 04/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by Pradeepan to set aside a commission report and survey sketch related to an injunction concerning property. Pushkaran, the defendant, opposed the petition, leading to a hearing on the merits of the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the plaintiff's petition, setting aside the commission report and survey sketch dated 25.06.2023. It determined the report was insufficient for adjudicating the dispute between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the plaintiff's petition, setting aside the commission report and survey sketch dated 25.06.2023. It determined the report was insufficient for adjudicating the dispute between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the commission report did not fulfill its intended purpose and that the survey sketch was inaccurate.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the commission report filed with sketch prepared by the Taluk Surveyor is not sufficient to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the Petition is allowed. Ext C1 and C1(a) dated 25.06.2023 is set aside.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pradeepan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pushkaran
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Peter T Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P G Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswathy Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Setting aside the commission report and survey sketch.
Evidence:
Hence the Ext C1 report and Ext C1(a) sketch is set aside.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court set aside the commission report due to its failure to accurately demarcate the property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Survey Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The survey sketch was also set aside as it failed to meet the requirements for a fair adjudication.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pradeepan vs Pushkaran regarding injunction concerning property
Case Code Year
Case between Pradeepan vs Pushkaran regarding injunction concerning property

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 07/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 04/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won