Case Summary
Pradeep Kumar, the plaintiff, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against Jenson Nunez, the defendant, to prevent obstruction of a construction. The defendant filed a counter claim for the fixation of boundaries and possession relating to certain property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Rs.500/- as costs to respondent
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the defendant's petition seeking to admit additional documents into evidence, finding it to be belated and lacking merit. The petitioner was directed to pay costs to the respondent.
Key Reasoning:
The court found no merit in the defendant's petition to accept additional documents, noting that the petition was belated and unnecessary to meet the ends of justice.
The court found no merit in the defendant's petition to accept additional documents, noting that the petition was belated and unnecessary to meet the ends of justice.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The present attempt of the petitioner is only to prolong the matter and he was cross examined on 05.09.23...if the above petition is allowed it will not meet the ends of justice.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, 1)Petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pradeep Kumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jenson Nunez
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
certificate from the village office and sketch showing that the counter claim schedule property is situated in old survey No.1327/4
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N.C.Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.P.Rexy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.Antony Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.L Sreedevi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.Sreedevi
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Chitra.R. Shenoy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition to accept documents in evidence
Evidence:
Hence this court does not find any merit in the above petition.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Cost to be paid to respondent
Evidence:
For the inconvenience caused to the respondent the petitioner is directed to pay Rs.500/- as costs to respondent.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certificate from Village Office
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
This document was sought to be accepted to prove the counter claim schedule property is situated in old survey No.1327/4.
Reference:
Document Type:
Sketch
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
This document was sought to be accepted to prove the counter claim schedule property is situated in old survey No.1327/4.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pradeep Kumar vs Jenson Nunez regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and counter claim for boundary fixation.
Case Code Year
Case between Pradeep Kumar vs Jenson Nunez regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and counter claim for boundary fixation.