Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.527 OF 2014

Case between P.P. Kumaran et al vs P.P. Aramughan et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-28
Duration
6 years 8 months 10 days
Case Closed
Wed, 03/28/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner sought the division of property as per a preliminary decree for partition dated 18-07-2013.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The final decree for partition was granted, allocating specific plots to each party.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The final decree for partition was granted, allocating specific plots to each party.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Advocate Commissioner divided the property equitably among parties based on the preliminary decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Advocate Commissioner divided the property equitably among parties based on the preliminary decree.
Supporting Evidence
Hence the towards equalization of shares the Respondent No.1 to 4 and 6 have to pay an amount of Rs.18,820/- to the plaintiff and an amount of Rs. 27,650/- to the 5th respondent. ...

Judgment Evidence:

The petition allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows: ...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.P. Kumaran
Party Age
60
Relation
Son of Karappan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.P. Aramughan
Party Age
52
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Parvathi
Party Age
51
Relation
Daughter of Karappan
Plaintiffs Documents
Preliminary decree for partition dated 18-07-2013
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. T. Ramgopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.H. Arshad Ayyoob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. N. Gopinathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition
Evidence:
The petition allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows: ...

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.P. Kumaran et al vs P.P. Aramughan et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between P.P. Kumaran et al vs P.P. Aramughan et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 07/18/2011 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/28/2018 - 12:00
From
Thu, 03/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Sat, 03/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Naseera et al vs Moideenkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ammunni et al vs Velukkutty et al regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Partial
Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between Kadiyumma vs Pathummakutty et al. regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Thottupurath Kormman's Son Chatha et al vs Koran et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won