Case Summary
P.P. Jamaludeen and Antony Joseph are the plaintiffs, while Zemia and Jaseena are the defendants. The case involves the plaintiffs' failure to remit the balance court fee, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiffs' failure to remit the balance court fee despite multiple extensions granted.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In the light of the above circumstances, the suit is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.P. Jamaludeen
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Antony Joseph
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Zemia
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jaseena
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bibin Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to the balance court fee not being remitted.
Evidence:
In the light of the above circumstances, the suit is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.P. Jamaludeen et al vs Zemia et al regarding balance court fee
Case Code Year
Case between P.P. Jamaludeen et al vs Zemia et al regarding balance court fee