Case Summary
The plaintiff, Ponnamma, is seeking an injunction against the defendants. The court delivered its judgment rejecting the plaint due to non-remittance of court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has rejected the plaint due to failure to remit the court fees as required.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 (c) of CPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ponnamma
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Little Flower
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jose Mon Jaravas
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sisili Cheriyan
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.V. Sajikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Justin Poulose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arathy Rajan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Injunction sought by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 (c) of CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ponnamma vs Little Flower et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ponnamma vs Little Flower et al regarding injunction