Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiffs P.K Sasidharan and others against the defendants The Aruvikkara Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalanayoagam and others seeking a declaration and injunction. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiffs, specifically Nos. 3, 8, and 9, were not interested in continuing the case, and therefore, the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs formally requested to discontinue the case.
The plaintiffs formally requested to discontinue the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court observed that the plaintiffs were not interested in continuing the case, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.K Sasidharan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chandraprasad P.N
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Radhamani
- Party Age
- 66
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajeev Kumar.S
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Salim Kumar
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Aruvikkara Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalanayoagam
- Relation
- represented by its General Secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SNDP Yogam, Ranni Union
- Relation
- represented by its Secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.N Somarajan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- O.N.Mohanan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.Suku
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sheeja Kannan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.Nizar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Beena For D1 and D2
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Neeravil S Anil Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff filed for declaration and injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff filed for declaration and injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.K Sasidharan et al vs The Aruvikkara Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalanayoagam et al regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between P.K Sasidharan et al vs The Aruvikkara Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalanayoagam et al regarding declaration and injunction