Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 854/2020

Case between P.J.James et al vs Cleetus et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-07-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including P.J.James and others, filed a suit against the defendants, including Cleetus and others. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their counsel.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as plaintiffs were absent and did not submit any proof affidavit. Therefore, the case could not proceed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as plaintiffs were absent and did not submit any proof affidavit. Therefore, the case could not proceed.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were absent and did not represent their case, resulting in a dismissal for default.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs were absent and did not represent their case, resulting in a dismissal for default.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent. Not represented. No proof affidavit seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.J.James
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sabeena Antony
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Omana Antony
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gracy Joseph
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mable James
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cleetus
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Silvy Mathew
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dayana Mathew
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anju Mathew
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asha Mathew
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.k.Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amrutha P.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.V.Sabu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nikhil K Sabu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.J.James et al vs Cleetus et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between P.J.James et al vs Cleetus et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won