Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 136/2025

Case between P.J.Jacob et al vs Aswathy Shaji regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-09-09
Duration
approximately-2 years 7 months
Case Closed
Tue, 09/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, P.J.Jacob and Sosamma Jacob, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Aswathy Shaji, who has made unlawful demands and threatened them regarding their son's alleged relationship with her. The defendant has visited the plaintiffs' property multiple times, causing them distress and fear of unlawful trespass.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendant from trespassing into their property and from interfering with their peaceful possession.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant her men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from interfering with the peaceful possession of plaintiffs over the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendant from trespassing into their property and from interfering with their peaceful possession.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The affidavit and documents produced by the plaintiffs satisfactorily proved their case regarding the unlawful demands and threats made by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The affidavit and documents produced by the plaintiffs satisfactorily proved their case regarding the unlawful demands and threats made by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaintiff's case. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. Defendant her men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from interfering with the peaceful possession of plaintiffs over the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.J.Jacob
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sosamma Jacob
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aswathy Shaji
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Sale deed no. 899/2021 of Maradu SRO, Basic tax receipt bearing Tandapper no. 34011 issued by Poonithura village office, Receipt bearing no. R-C070100-25100563 issued by Kochi Municipal Corporation
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul Dalin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jerome P.G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rahib K.Y
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajmal Khan C.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant and her agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendant her men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from interfering with the peaceful possession of plaintiffs over the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiffs' ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as additional evidence of the plaintiffs' ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Municipal Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further supports the plaintiffs' claims to ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Marked subject to proof but not considered due to lack of subsequent proof.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.J.Jacob et al vs Aswathy Shaji regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between P.J.Jacob et al vs Aswathy Shaji regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/26/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 09/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won