Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 827/2016

Case between Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram vs Renjith et al regarding management of the temple

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months
Case Closed
Mon, 06/08/2020 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs represent a temple society and claim their right to manage the temple, alleging trespass and misappropriation by the defendants. The defendants contend the plaintiffs lack authority to manage the temple and seek to dismiss the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The review petition filed by the defendants was dismissed, as the court found no grounds for reconsideration of the earlier judgment.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The review petition filed by the defendants was dismissed, as the court found no grounds for reconsideration of the earlier judgment.
Key Reasoning:
The court concluded no error apparent on the face of the record existed to warrant a review.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There is no error apparent on face of the record or any other valid ground under Order XLVII R.1 of the CPC to entertain the present review petition.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed. Considering the nature and circumstances of the case there is no order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.Aravindakshan
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.Sivaprasad
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.Subhash Bose
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renjith
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anilkumar
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dharma Rajan
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nandakumar
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manikandan
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Reghuvarma
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.Syamaprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram vs Renjith et al regarding management of the temple
Case Code Year
Case between Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram vs Renjith et al regarding management of the temple

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 06/15/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/08/2020 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Temple

Similar Cases

Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vanchippuzhakkavu et al vs Krishnakumar et al regarding setting aside ex-parte decree.
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sree Mulankadakom Devi Temple Trust Administrative Committee vs Baburaj regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won