Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 07/2018

Case between Peter et al vs Aravind Kumar et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-02-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Peter and Peter Antony, were involved in a lawsuit against defendants Aravind Kumar and M/s. Skyline Builders. The matter was settled between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed following an agreement between the parties. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed following an agreement between the parties. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Peter
Party Age
93
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Peter Antony
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph Xavier
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
George Peter
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Teresa Augustine
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aravind Kumar
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Skyline Builders
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.J. Joy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Valsamma Kurian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.M Mathai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shyam V.K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Peter et al vs Aravind Kumar et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Peter et al vs Aravind Kumar et al regarding dismissal of suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won