ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 332 OF 2011

Case between Periyangot Lakshmikutty and Karthika vs Ramesh Kumar and Reena regarding temporary injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt.NIMMI.K.K., B.Sc., LL.B.

Order Date

2018-12-06

Duration

7 years

Case Closed

Thu, 12/06/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking temporary injunction against the defendants, but the suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Decided

Case Type

Civil Suit - Temporary Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit filed by the plaintiffs for temporary injunction was dismissed due to their absence during the hearing.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default without costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Periyangot Lakshmikutty
Party Age: 48
Relation: D/o. Vadakke Kakkuzhath Achuthan Nair

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Karthika
Relation: Unknown

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ramesh Kumar
Party Age: 38
Relation: S/o. Koru

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Reena
Party Age: 43
Relation: D/o. Koru

Plaintiffs Documents

Vakalath with no instruction

Defendants Documents

Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. C.Nandakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Seeking temporary injunction

Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default without costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Vakalath

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

No instruction endorsed on Vakalath.

Reference:

No instruction

Case Classification