Case Summary
The case involves the petitioner Pavithran who is seeking to restore a petition that was previously dismissed. The respondents Anil Kumar and Rajeswari remained absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to restore the original petition was allowed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court granted the petitioner one more opportunity to proceed with the matter in the interest of justice.
The court granted the petitioner one more opportunity to proceed with the matter in the interest of justice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interest of justice, I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the matter.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pavithran
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anil Kumar
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajeswari
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Shaiju Mangad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed to restore RP. 192/24 on file.
Evidence:
I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the matter.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022