Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1125 /2023

Case between Pauls Creamery Pvt. Ltd vs Seawood Homes(India) Pvt. Ltd regarding arbitration

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-12-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Pauls Creamery Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against Seawood Homes(India) Pvt. Ltd. The court decided to refer the matter to arbitration, leading to the dismissal of the suit as not maintainable.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court referred the matter to arbitration and dismissed the suit as not maintainable.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court referred the matter to arbitration and dismissed the suit as not maintainable.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the suit was not maintainable and referred the matter to arbitration.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that the suit was not maintainable and referred the matter to arbitration.
Supporting Evidence
The court determined that the suit was not maintainable and referred the matter to arbitration.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not maintainable.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pauls Creamery Pvt. Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Seawood Homes(India) Pvt. Ltd
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M N Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Viswanath Salish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amal A R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Karthika Maria
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Veena Raveendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Navya Seby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shyni William
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not maintainable.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not maintainable.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pauls Creamery Pvt. Ltd vs Seawood Homes(India) Pvt. Ltd regarding arbitration
Case Code Year
Case between Pauls Creamery Pvt. Ltd vs Seawood Homes(India) Pvt. Ltd regarding arbitration

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won