Case Summary
Parappurath Muhammed, the plaintiff, filed a suit for injunction which was dismissed in the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parappurath Muhammed
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o. Ahammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prabu
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o. Kumaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anjana Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Mujeeb Rehman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Parappurath Muhammed vs Prabu regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Parappurath Muhammed vs Prabu regarding injunction