Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restoration Petition 1245/2015

Case between Panikkottil Kunhimuhammed vs Kuttan et al regarding restoration petition

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-03-10
Duration
1 year, 9 months, 18 days
Case Closed
Fri, 03/10/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The court heard a restoration petition by Panikkottil Kunhimuhammed against Kuttan and others due to a 6-month delay, which could only be condoned with a substantial cost. The petition was allowed on the condition of payment of costs and dismissed the Interlocutory Application (IA).

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition by Panikkottil Kunhimuhammed was allowed with a cost of Rs. 4000/-, the Interlocutory Application (IA) was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition by Panikkottil Kunhimuhammed was allowed with a cost of Rs. 4000/-, the Interlocutory Application (IA) was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
I am inclined to allow this petition on costs of Rs. 4000/- and for payment.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Panikkottil Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuttan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of the petition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allowing the restoration petition on costs of Rs. 4000/-
Evidence:
Allowed this petition on costs of Rs. 4000/- and for payment.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Panikkottil Kunhimuhammed vs Kuttan et al regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Panikkottil Kunhimuhammed vs Kuttan et al regarding restoration petition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 05/23/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/10/2017 - 12:00
From
Wed, 03/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 03/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty vs Kalarikkal Kunhimon regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won