Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor.Ptn/263/2017

Case between Pachayi Pathumma vs Moideen Kutty regarding restoration petition

Court
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2017-06-08
Duration
0 years, 4 months, 19 days
Case Closed
Thu, 06/08/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Pachayi Pathumma, aged 78, filed a restoration petition against Moideen Kutty in the Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram on medical grounds. The court allowed the petition on payment of costs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition on payment of costs of Rs.3000. In case of default, the petition stands dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the suit
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition on payment of costs of Rs.3000. In case of default, the petition stands dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is filed on medical ground. But no documents produced. The respondent filed counter stating the same. Since the IA can be allowed on enumeration costs and for enabling the petitioner to conduct the suit. I am inclined to allow the petition on payment of costs of Rs.3000/- On default of payment on or before 8/6/17 the petition shall stands dismissed. Cost paid. Memo filed. Hence IA allowed. Suit is restored as per order in IA 263/17 listed to 18-8-2017

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pachayi Pathumma
Party Age
78
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moideen Kutty
Party Age
58
Plaintiffs Documents
No documents produced
Defendants Documents
No documents mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of the suit
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration of the suit allowed on payment of costs
Evidence:
The petition is filed on medical ground. But no documents produced. The respondent filed counter stating the same. Since the IA can be allowed on enumeration costs and for enabling the petitioner to conduct the suit. I am inclined to allow the petition on payment of costs of Rs.3000/- On default of payment on or before 8/6/17 the petition shall stands dismissed. Cost paid. Memo filed. Hence IA allowed. Suit is restored as per order in IA 263/17 listed to 18-8-2017

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pachayi Pathumma vs Moideen Kutty regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Pachayi Pathumma vs Moideen Kutty regarding restoration petition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 01/24/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/08/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 06/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty vs Kalarikkal Kunhimon regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won