Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 87/2024

Case between P. K Rukmini Amma et al vs C.S Jayakumar regarding Dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves P. K Rukmini Amma and Geetha as plaintiffs against C.S Jayakumar. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's continuous absence despite specific directions to appear.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff was absent without representation and despite specific directives to appear. As a result, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was absent without representation and despite specific directives to appear. As a result, the suit was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The defendant was not responsible for the plaintiff's absence in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendant was not responsible for the plaintiff's absence in court.
Supporting Evidence
Defendant represented. Plaintiff is continuously absent without representation and is absent despite specific direction to appear.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed. Defendant is not interested to proceed with the suit. Plaintiff No.1 is no more. Plaintiff absent despite specific direction to appear.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. K Rukmini Amma
Party Age
85
Relation
W/o. Late Sri. V. P Sreedharan Pillai
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o. V.R Neelakandan Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.S Jayakumar
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o. Late Sri. V. P Sreedharan Pillai
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. S Sreeprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. J Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Girish R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P. K Rukmini Amma et al vs C.S Jayakumar regarding Dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between P. K Rukmini Amma et al vs C.S Jayakumar regarding Dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won