Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 212/2025

Case between P C Abdul Rasheed vs Mohammed Junaid regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
Court of the Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Anjali.P
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-1 year 8 days
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, P C Abdul Rasheed, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Mohammed Junaid, to prevent forceful eviction from the plaint schedule property. The plaintiff claims to have been a tenant for twenty-eight years and is apprehensive of being dispossessed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property. The defendant was also directed to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against dispossession and obstruction of peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property. The defendant was also directed to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established his long-standing tenancy and the defendant's attempt to unlawfully evict him.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established his long-standing tenancy and the defendant's attempt to unlawfully evict him.
Supporting Evidence
The fact that the plaintiff is the tenant in respect of the plaint schedule property and he is doing business therein is amply proved by the evidence presented, including various lease agreements.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant, their men and agents are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property otherwise than by due process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P C Abdul Rasheed
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Junaid
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Licence Agreements and Rent Receipts
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. S. Saji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Diljith. C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant, their men and agents are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The suit is liable to be decreed and I do so.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the costs of the proceedings to the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay the costs of the proceedings to the plaintiffs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant dated 19.10.2006.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant dated 04.03.2013.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant dated 19.03.2016.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant dated 07.10.2016.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant dated 07.10.2017.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant dated 22.11.2018.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Rent Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the rent receipts issued by the defendant to the plaintiff from 25.2.2013 to 10/07/2024.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report by Shameena. K. C, Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P C Abdul Rasheed vs Mohammed Junaid regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between P C Abdul Rasheed vs Mohammed Junaid regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 10/22/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolassery Abdurahim vs Kanjirangal Kareem et al regarding property delivery
Rent Control Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Girija et al vs Komalam et al regarding partition
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Fathima Minha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between M Sukumaran vs K. Ahammed et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won