Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 500/2025

Case between N.V.John vs George Puthokkaran regarding arbitration of a suit.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-12-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves N.V.John as the plaintiff and George Puthokkaran as the defendant. The suit has been dismissed and referred to arbitration.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the IA and referred the subject matter of the suit to arbitration, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the IA and referred the subject matter of the suit to arbitration, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The subject matter of the suit was referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Why Defendant Won:
The subject matter of the suit was referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Supporting Evidence
The subject matter of suit is referred to arbitration under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit came up before me for hearing on 18.12.2025... Suit is dismissed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.V.John
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Puthokkaran
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shaji Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Subin K. Sudheer
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amal Baby
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajay Gopal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nandukrishna D.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Fazil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saju Thaliath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jithin Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prabitha C.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswathy Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Akshaya Thomas
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Fadil Fazil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed accordingly.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed accordingly.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N.V.John vs George Puthokkaran regarding arbitration of a suit.
Case Code Year
Case between N.V.John vs George Puthokkaran regarding arbitration of a suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won