Case Summary
The petitioner N.Vijayakumar, aged 50, sought to restore a petition under Order IX Rule 4 of CPC. The respondent B.S.Krishnakumar was present, and both sides were represented during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed due to both parties being absent.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
Both sides absent, represented. Submitted that key surrendered and RP endorsed as not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N.Vijayakumar
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- B.S.Krishnakumar
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.Geetha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- NIL
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition filed by the petitioner to restore the petition u/O IX R 4 of CPC.
Evidence:
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N.Vijayakumar vs B.S.Krishnakumar regarding restoration of petition
Case Code Year
Case between N.Vijayakumar vs B.S.Krishnakumar regarding restoration of petition