Case Summary
The case involves N.S.Rajan as the plaintiff and Mrs. Remya Anil Kumar as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to failure to pay the necessary balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected for payment of Balance court fee.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N.S.Rajan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Remya Anil Kumar
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Varghese P Chacko
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dennis Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nisha K.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- George Varghese P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for payment of Balance court fee
Evidence:
No Balance court fee seen remitted. No petition seen filed for enlargement of time. Hence, plaint is rejected for payment of Balance court fee.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N.S.Rajan vs Mrs. Remya Anil Kumar regarding plaint rejection for balance court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between N.S.Rajan vs Mrs. Remya Anil Kumar regarding plaint rejection for balance court fee.