Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restoration Petition 2384/2016

Case between Not mentioned vs Not mentioned regarding Restoration Petition

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-04-11
Duration
0 years, 4 months, 24 days
Case Closed
Tue, 04/11/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner filed a restoration petition which was allowed on payment of a cost of Rs.4000. The petition was dismissed as the cost was not paid.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed as the cost of Rs.4000 was not paid.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as the cost of Rs.4000 was not paid.
Key Reasoning:
Cost of Rs.4000 was not paid by the petitioner resulting in the dismissal of the petition.
Why Defendant Won:
Cost of Rs.4000 was not paid by the petitioner resulting in the dismissal of the petition.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Cost not paid. Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Not mentioned
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Not mentioned
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not mentioned
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Not mentioned
Evidence:
Cost not paid. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Not mentioned vs Not mentioned regarding Restoration Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Not mentioned vs Not mentioned regarding Restoration Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 11/19/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 04/11/2017 - 12:00
From
Sat, 04/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sun, 04/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty vs Kalarikkal Kunhimon regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won