Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 701/2020

Case between Nobel Kuriakose vs Manju Paulose regarding court fee payment

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-12-12
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 12/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nobel Kuriakose filed a suit against Manju Paulose regarding the payment of court fees. The court ultimately rejected the plaint due to non-payment of the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the required balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the required balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff failed to comply with the court's directive regarding payment of court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff failed to comply with the court's directive regarding payment of court fees.
Supporting Evidence
No balance court fee as specifically directed on 20.09.2025 seen complied with.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nobel Kuriakose
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manju Paulose
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hari Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Preetha Hari
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dinesh R. Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Soumya T.D.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joseph George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence the plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nobel Kuriakose vs Manju Paulose regarding court fee payment
Case Code Year
Case between Nobel Kuriakose vs Manju Paulose regarding court fee payment

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 12/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won