Case Summary
The case involves the plaintiff Nizarudheen seeking a declaration and injunction against the defendants Saifudheen and Sulbath. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and the case was dismissed due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to absence and failure to remit the balance court fee. Sufficient opportunities were given to the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, represented. Balance Court Fee not remitted. Sufficient opportunities given. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nizarudheen
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saifudheen
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulbath
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Panambil S.Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Bahuleyan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arun Babu
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Reshmi S. Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff filed for declaration and injunction.
Evidence:
Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nizarudheen vs Saifudheen et al regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Nizarudheen vs Saifudheen et al regarding declaration and injunction