Case Summary
The plaintiff, Nizamudeen, represented by Babitha, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Najima.S and Nisar. The case was heard on 08.08.2025 but the plaintiff was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nizamudeen
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Najima.S
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nisar
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bijimol.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Hareesh. C.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kannanalloor.S. Abdul Karim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nizamudeen vs Najima.S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Nizamudeen vs Najima.S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction