Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 682/2023

Case between Nisamudheen vs Meharuneesa et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Nisamudheen, has filed for an injunction against the defendants, including Meharuneesa and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of instruction from the plaintiff's counsel.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of instruction from the plaintiff's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nisamudheen
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Meharuneesa
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nazimudeen
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Surumi Mol @ Haleema
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noufal
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shyma
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gokul P Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chithra. B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Francis Jude Netto
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.S Manohar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, represented. Counsel submit that no instruction from plaintiff. Today posted for exparte evidence. Plaintiff not present. Not file affidavit. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nisamudheen vs Meharuneesa et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Nisamudheen vs Meharuneesa et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won