Case Summary
The case involves the plaintiff Nirmala filing for an injunction against the defendants Johnson, Mercy, and Lijo mol. However, both the plaintiff and defendants were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendants during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, no representation. Plaintiff called absent. Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nirmala
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Johnson
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mercy
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lijo mol
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Bindu Sankarapillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for injunction u/s 26 u/O VII R.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, no representation. Plaintiff called absent. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nirmala vs Johnson et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Nirmala vs Johnson et al regarding injunction