Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 548/2019

Case between Nirmal Kumar Shenoy vs Varghese A. Augustin et al regarding non-payment of balance court fees

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-09-11
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 09/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nirmal Kumar Shenoy filed a suit against Varghese A. Augustin and State Bank of India regarding non-payment of balance court fees. The plaintiff did not represent in court leading to the rejection of the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected for non-payment of balance court fees as the plaintiff did not represent. The court closed the pending interlocutory applications with no costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected for non-payment of balance court fees as the plaintiff did not represent. The court closed the pending interlocutory applications with no costs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's failure to appear and pay the required fees led to the rejection of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's failure to appear and pay the required fees led to the rejection of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff no representation. Hence the plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fees.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nirmal Kumar Shenoy
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varghese A. Augustin
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shaji N.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fees.
Evidence:
Hence the plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fees.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nirmal Kumar Shenoy vs Varghese A. Augustin et al regarding non-payment of balance court fees
Case Code Year
Case between Nirmal Kumar Shenoy vs Varghese A. Augustin et al regarding non-payment of balance court fees

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 09/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won