Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1170/2022

Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-08-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nikhil.N. Asher, the plaintiff and Managing Partner of Kumud Enterprises, filed a suit against the firm Plymart and its partners for the recovery of an outstanding amount. The defendants acknowledged the debt but failed to make the remaining payment despite multiple requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover the outstanding amount due from the defendants. The plaintiff is entitled to also receive interest on the due amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,61,524/- and interest at specified rates.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover the outstanding amount due from the defendants. The plaintiff is entitled to also receive interest on the due amount.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted oral testimony of the plaintiff and relevant exhibits established the claim of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted oral testimony of the plaintiff and relevant exhibits established the claim of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1, A2, A3, A5 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,61,524/- from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nikhil.N. Asher
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Plymart
Relation
Represented through
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Suhail
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Madari Muhammed Fijas
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raravetty Muhammed Salim
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Sharafudheen
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Print out of Statement of Account from 01.04.2019 to 31.03.2020, Copy of Lawyer's Notice issued to the defendants dated 01.12.2021, Original Postal Receipt.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.G. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of Rs.1,61,524/- along with interest and costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,61,524/- (Rupees One Lakh Sixty One Thousand Five Hundred and Twenty Four only) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 12% per annum on Rs.1,61,524/- from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.1,61,524/- (Rupees One Lakh Sixty One Thousand Five Hundred and Twenty Four only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 6% per annum on Rs.1,61,524/- from the date of decree till realization.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.1,61,524/- (Rupees One Lakh Sixty One Thousand Five Hundred and Twenty Four only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit to be realized from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Printout of Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the statement of account showing transactions related to the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice issued to the defendants demanding payment of the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of dispatch of the legal notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certification of Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certification confirming the authenticity of Ext.A1.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Careon Healthcare Solutions (P) Ltd. vs Mr. BINOY PHILIP regarding realisation of money.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won