Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1043/2025

Case between Nidhi Mary George vs Deepa S et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2026-01-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nidhi Mary George filed a suit against Deepa S and N.Harikumar. The case was settled through mediation with terms agreed upon by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of a compromise agreement reached during mediation, with one specific clause found unlawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit decreed in terms of the compromise agreement except clause 5.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of a compromise agreement reached during mediation, with one specific clause found unlawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Agreement reached in mediation was lawful except for one clause.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Agreement reached in mediation was lawful except for one clause.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the compromise agreement forming part of the Mediation Report except clause 5 found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement except clause 5.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nidhi Mary George
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepa S
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N.Harikumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ratheesh M.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johny Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abhilash Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vidya G Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement except clause 5.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement except clause 5.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
IA 3/26 is allowed.
Evidence:
Hence, IA 3/26 is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nidhi Mary George vs Deepa S et al regarding mediation settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Nidhi Mary George vs Deepa S et al regarding mediation settlement

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won