Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.879/2025

Case between Neeraj Kishore. R. vs Anish P.S et al regarding compromise agreement

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-11-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Neeraj Kishore. R. as the plaintiff and Anish P.S along with Gopika.J as defendants. They reached a compromise agreement which was approved by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement. The plan attached to the petition was made part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement. The plan attached to the petition was made part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
The court was satisfied that the terms entered between the parties are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

I am satisfied that the terms entered between the parties are lawful hence IA 3/25 is allowed and the suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement and plan attached in it shall form the part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Neeraj Kishore. R.
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anish P.S
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopika.J.
Party Age
34
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Jaideep G. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Sreeja Sasidharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Haripriya.J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Evidence:
IA 3/25, compromise petition filed. I am satisfied that the terms entered between the parties are lawful hence IA 3/25 is allowed and the suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the compromise petition filed and the suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Reference:
IA 3/25

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Neeraj Kishore. R. vs Anish P.S et al regarding compromise agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Neeraj Kishore. R. vs Anish P.S et al regarding compromise agreement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Application in Pauper Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won