Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P. No. 356/2025 in OS No.1299/2014

Case between Neena P Unni et al vs Vijayan K A regarding execution petition

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2026-01-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Neena P Unni and Pran Pradeep are the decree holders in this execution petition against Vijayan K A, the judgment debtor. The court allowed the petition and transferred the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the execution petition and transferred the decree as requested by the decree holders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree transferred
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the execution petition and transferred the decree as requested by the decree holders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed as it met the necessary legal requirements.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was allowed as it met the necessary legal requirements.
Supporting Evidence
The court allowed the execution petition based on its merits.

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day passed the following: EA 1/26 allowed. Decree transferred.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Neena P Unni
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o Late Pradeep Kumar K.P.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pran Pradeep
Party Age
22
Relation
S/o Late Pradeep Kumar K
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayan K A
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o Aravindaksha Kaimal
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. DEVANAND
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.G. Devipriya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ushakumari M.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. Kiran Dev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Devanarayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.M. Subramania Iyer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.devadevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishnu Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
EA 1/26 allowed. Decree transferred.
Evidence:
EA 1/26 allowed. Decree transferred.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Neena P Unni et al vs Vijayan K A regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Neena P Unni et al vs Vijayan K A regarding execution petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won