Case Summary
The petitioner N.Cherupushpam seeks to restore a suit that was previously dismissed. The defendant J.Vijayan opposes the restoration of the suit and the court has to decide on the matter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has dismissed the petition to restore the suit based on the findings that the petitioner's reasons were false and misleading.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was not entitled to relief based on the misleading affidavit.
The petitioner was not entitled to relief based on the misleading affidavit.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner was not entitled to relief based on the misleading affidavit.
The petitioner was not entitled to relief based on the misleading affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
The reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit is false and misleading the court.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, IA. 1/25 and RP. 17/25 are dismissed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N.Cherupushpam
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- J.Vijayan
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Reshmi.S.Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The petitioner is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.
Evidence:
Hence the petitioner is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N.Cherupushpam vs J.Vijayan regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between N.Cherupushpam vs J.Vijayan regarding restoration of suit