Case Summary
Two plaintiffs filed a suit for injunction against the defendants. The plaintiff's counsel reported lack of instructions from the client, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the lack of instructions from the plaintiff's side.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
The suit for injunction is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nafeesumol
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- Wife of Hamsakkoya
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kamaruneesa
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- Daughter of Hamzakkoya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nasar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- Son of Ayamu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Assistant Engineer KSB, Tanur Sub division
- Relation
- Not mentioned
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P. Khaleel Ibrahim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for injunction
Evidence:
The suit for injunction is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nafeesumol et al vs Nasar et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Nafeesumol et al vs Nasar et al regarding injunction