Case Summary
Nadarsha. A is seeking to correct his date of birth in his passport from 14/10/1961 to 10/05/1970. The defendant, The Regional Passport Officer, contends that the suit is not maintainable and the details in the passport were correctly entered based on the initial application.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, ruling that the plaintiff failed to establish any entitlement to correction of the date of birth in his passport.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to justify the correction of the date of birth in the passport.
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to justify the correction of the date of birth in the passport.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to justify the correction of the date of birth in the passport.
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to justify the correction of the date of birth in the passport.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has failed to establish any entitlement to the reliefs sought. The evidence on record does not disclose any bona fide mistake warranting interference with the date of birth recorded in the passport after such a long lapse of time.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result; The suit is dismissed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nadarsha. A
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Regional Passport Officer
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Passport, Original extract of the admission register
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. F. Nahas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Shibukumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a declaration to correct the date of birth in the passport.
Evidence:
this Court is of the considered opinion that the plaintiff has failed to establish any entitlement to the reliefs sought.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Passport
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is used to identify the plaintiff's incorrect date of birth recorded as 14/10/1961 instead of the correct date 10/05/1970.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Admission Register Extract
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the plaintiff's true date of birth as recorded in the admission register.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019