Case Summary
M.V. Ramakrishnan filed a suit against Shimna for the realisation of money. The case was heard in the Munsiff Court, Kollam.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and the defendant without evidence being produced.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.V. Ramakrishnan
- Party Age
- 88
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shimna
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Raghu Varma K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jayan S.G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Soumya Swaminathan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
The suit was filed for realisation of money but was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.V. Ramakrishnan vs Shimna regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between M.V. Ramakrishnan vs Shimna regarding realisation of money