Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 134 OF 2016

Case between Muraleekrishnan vs Parameswaran, Devaki regarding declaration and injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-01-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Muraleekrishnan as the plaintiff against defendants Parameswaran and Devaki. The suit was filed for declaration and injunction but was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit has been dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not present to represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not present to represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff's counsel reported no instruction. Plaintiff's name called absent, not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default with costs to 1st defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muraleekrishnan
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Parameswaran
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Devaki
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Vipin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. T.Ramgopal.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs to 1st defendant.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Claim for injunction was part of the suit which was dismissed
Evidence:
Suit for declaration and injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muraleekrishnan vs Parameswaran, Devaki regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Muraleekrishnan vs Parameswaran, Devaki regarding declaration and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 01/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won