Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by Muraleedharan.T against Rajan for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muraleedharan.T
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajan
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.T.KShibu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sajna Mohammed Ali
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff presented a suit for Permanent prohibitory Injunction.
Evidence:
Plaint presented by the plaintiff under Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1 of CPC for Permanent prohibitory Injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muraleedharan.T vs Rajan regarding Permanent prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Muraleedharan.T vs Rajan regarding Permanent prohibitory Injunction