Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 146/2022

Case between Muraleedharan M. vs Ranjini P. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-2 years 15 days
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muraleedharan M. is the plaintiff who claims to be a tenant of a flat owned by Ranjini P. The case involves a dispute over the tenancy rights and a demand for a permanent injunction against the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff had no legal right to occupy the property and thus dismissed the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff had no legal right to occupy the property and thus dismissed the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff could not establish a legal tenancy relationship with the defendant.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff could not establish a legal tenancy relationship with the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore, these issues are found against the plaintiff and answered accordingly.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muraleedharan M.
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ranjini P.
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Electricity bill issued by KSEB office, Gas refilling bill issued by Calicut Gas Service, Receipt issued by Kerala Water authority
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Shanavas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.B. Sahasranaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Vidhya P.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, he is not entitled to seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the true owner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Electricity Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Electricity bill issued by KSEB to show that the plaintiff was residing in the flat.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Gas Refilling Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Gas bill issued to demonstrate the plaintiff's usage of the flat.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Water Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt from Kerala Water Authority indicating the plaintiff's utility payments.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muraleedharan M. vs Ranjini P. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Muraleedharan M. vs Ranjini P. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 02/28/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won